Femi Fani-Kayode: ​A night of darkness and the law of Karma

Given the fact that we are still commemorating the fifty year anniversary of the January 15th 1966 coup I have decided to write a follow-up essay to last week’s column. It is interesting to note the fact that virtually every single one of those that actually carried out the killings and pulled the triggers during the course of that horrendous night of slaughter met a terrible end themselves.

This is a fulfilment of the scripture that says ‘’he who lives by the sword shall die by the sword’’ and we must all learn from it. Shedding innocent blood is an expensive business and drawing the first blood in any conflict always comes with a very heavy price. In secular circles this is known as the ‘’law of karma’’ but in spiritual ones it is called ‘’the law of reaping and sowing’’.

Nothing reflects this principle better than what happened to those that actually murdered others (as opposed to those that simply participated) during the course of Nigeria’s first military coup on the night of January 15th 1966. The facts are as follows.
Major Emmanuel Ifeajuna, who was the leader of the coup, went to the home of Brigadier Zakariya Maimalari (who was the Commanding Officer of the Second Brigade) and personally shot him. This was despite the fact that he was one of his most trusted officers and confidantes and despite the fact that earlier that evening he had attended a cocktail party in his house. After killing Maimalari, Ifeajuna went to Ikoyi Hotel, where Lt. Col. Abogo Largema, who was the Commander of the Fourth Battalion in Ibadan, was staying and he personally shot and killed him too.
After that both he and Major Donatus Okafor, another of the mutineers, abducted Sir Tafawa Balewa, the Prime Minister, from his home and took him to the Officers Mess at Dodan Barracks. Once it was clear to them that the coup was unraveling they fled from Dodan Barracks, drove to the Lagos Abeokuta road, shot the Prime Minister and then dumped his body in a bush. The Special Branch reports show that both Ifeajuna and Major Okafor shot Tafawa Balewa at point blank range in the head and body.

Yet their end was no better. Ifeajuna, after fleeing to Ghana after the failure of the coup, returned back to Nigeria the following year to fight for Biafra during the civil war. He was later accused of plotting a coup to remove Colonel Emeka Ojukwu as Head of State of Biafra and he was executed on Ojukwu’s orders after being court martialled. Major Okafor’s end was even worse. He was locked up in Abeokuta prison after the coup failed because he was unable to escape. Six months later, on July 29th 1966 during the northern revenge coup, he was dragged out of his cell and buried alive by northern soldiers.

Major Anufuro, who in my view was the most bloodthirsty and brutal of all the mutineers, personally shot and killed four people in Lagos on the night of January 15th 1966. He went to the homes of Colonel Kur Mohammed, the Chief of Army Staff, and Lt. Col. Arthur Unegbe, the Army Quarter-Master General, both of whom lived in Apapa GRA and shot them both to death in front of their families. After that he went to Dodan Barracks where some of the other mutineers, led by Major Humphrey Chukwuka, had forcefully taken Lt. Col. James Pam, the Adjutant General of the Nigerian Army, and Chief Festus Okotie- Eboh, the Minister of Finance.
As the coup started unraveling Anufuro fled Dodan Barracks and took Lt. Col. Pam and Chief Okotie Eboh with him. As he drove further into Ikoyi he stopped the convoy of vehicles, parked his car and told Pam and Okotie-Eboh to step down. As they did so he shot them both at close range, put their bodies in the same Bedford truck that the bodies of Col. Kur Mohammed and Lt. Col. Arthur Unegbe had earlier been dumped and drove to the meeting point at the Lagos Abeokuta road. On arrival at the meeting point Anufuro and his men proceeded to remove the four bodies from the Bedford truck and as they did so they discovered that Okotie-Eboh was still alive though badly wounded. Anufuro asked the Minister to walk into the bush and as he did so he shot him in the back of the head. After that the four bodies were dumped into a shallow grave and the mutineers fled.
Major Anuforo’s end was as bad as the end of those he murdered, if not worse. After the failure of the coup he was captured and locked up in Benin prison. One year later after the civil war began, Federal troops discovered that he was locked up in Benin. They promptly stormed the prison, found him in his cell, dragged him out and beheaded him. Given the fact that Anufuro had been so heartless on the night of January 15th I am not surprised by the brutality of the Federal troops.

Major Timothy Onwuatuegwu was one of those that led the Kaduna operation of the mutiny. He went to the home of Colonel Ralph Shodeinde, the Deputy Commandant of the Nigerian Military Training College, and he personally shot him to death. He also wounded his wife. After that he went to the home of Brigadier Samuel Ademulegun, the Commandant of the First Brigade, burst into his bedroom and personally shot him and his eight month pregnant wife to death with a machine gun.

Onwuatuegwu’s end was no better than that of those that he murdered on the night of January 15th 1966. He was captured and locked up after the failure of the coup. During the civil war, which started one year later, he fought on the Biafran side. A few days after the end of the war he was lured into a hotel room in the east by a group of men and women for a meeting where he was murdered in the most gruesome manner.
I will not give details of how he was killed here because they are far too gruesome for publication. Little did Onwuatuegwu know that the men and women that had invited him into the hotel room were working for the Nigerian secret service and that they were in the company of Federal troops. What an irony it is that he had killed others in the presence of their wives whilst he himself was killed in the presence of strange women.

Major Kaduna Nzeogwu, the leader of the mutiny in the northern part of the country, stormed the home of Sir Ahmadu Bello, the Saurdana of Sokoto and the Premier of the North, in Kaduna on the night of the coup. He personally shot the Saurdana, his wife (whose name was Habsetu) and his traditional bodyguard (whose name was Zarumi) and who had fought back with a sword. After the coup failed Nzeogwu was captured and locked up. He fought on the side of Biafra during the civil war but he was badly wounded and eventually killed in the Nsukka sector whilst he was on a reconnaissance night mission by Federal troops.
Captain Emmanuel Nwobosi led the Ibadan axis of the mutiny that took place on the night of January 15th 1966. He led his soldiers to our house and he took my father, Chief Remilekun Fani-Kayode, the Balogun of Ife and the Deputy Premier of the West, away. I witnessed the whole affair and the abduction and, as I wrote in this column last week, it was frightful and horrific. After leaving our house Nwobosi led his soldiers to the home of my uncle, Chief S.L. Akintola, the Aare Kakanfo of the Yoruba and the Premier of the West. When they got there Chief Akintola resisted arrest and there was a one hour long gun battle.
After his ammunition ran out Akintola stepped out of his house and he was shot by virtually every single one of the soldiers as he did so. This was because two of them had been badly wounded by Akintola and his policemen during the course of the gunfight. The first was a soldier by the name of James, who had his fingers blown off, and the second was a soldier whose name was not recorded but who screamed very loudly after his ear was blown off.
Interestingly of all the officers that personally shot anyone that night it is only Nwobosi that remains alive. He fought for Biafra during the civil war and after the war he was given a very key position in the Guyanese army. After serving for a number of years there he left Guyana and went to live in Canada for many years. He has since returned to Nigeria and he now lives in Onitsha. His end has not yet come but I have little doubt that he is still haunted by the innocent blood that he shed that night even if he finds it difficult to admit it.
I wholeheartedly condemn his actions that night and I still mourn my dear uncle S.L. Akintola and all the other innocent souls that were killed that night yet I do not judge him or any of the other mutineers. It is God alone that can judge us for our actions and inactions and I harbor no hate, bitterness or malice for those that abducted and murdered our fathers, leaders and heroes on the night of January 15th 1966. I simply leave them to God.
I will say though that I find it instructive that every single one of those that actually pulled the trigger and killed their victims during the course of the operation and that participated in the heartless orgy of violence and slaughter that took place that night, with the exception of Nwobosi, ended in a terrible way. Of the eight majors and one captain (Captain Ogbo Oji) that were the ringleaders of the coup it is interesting to note that only Major Chukwuka and Major Ademoyega never killed anyone during the course of the operation.

They participated fully in the mutiny, they terrorized and abducted people from their homes but history records that they didn’t actually kill anyone or pull the trigger themselves at any time. The two fought on the Biafran side during the civil war, under Lt. Col. Victor Banjo, and they not only survived the war but they also lived for many years thereafter.

Ademoyega died in 2005 whilst Chukwuka is still alive and lives in the east. I have little doubt that they would both have shared the same miserable fate of their co-conspirators and fellow mutineers and they would both been also cut short if they had personally shed innocent blood on the night of January 15th 1966 as well. The Lord is merciful to those that show mercy: He visits His judgement upon those that delight in spilling blood and in taking the life of their prey.

Where Are The Public Intellectuals? | By: Reuben Abati

Something sad has happened and is happening, and is getting worse in our society: the decline of public intellectualism. 
And so I ask, where are the public intellectuals? Once upon a time in this country, the public arena was dominated by a ferment of ideas, ideas that pushed boundaries, destroyed illusions, questioned orthodoxies and enabled societal progress.  Those were the days when intellectuals exerted great influence on public policy, and their input into the governance process could not be ignored. Ideas are strong elements of nation building, and even where interests are at play, you know the quality of a country by the manner in which a taste for good thinking propels the leadership process. 

       Public intellectuals are at the centre of this phenomenon: they include academics who go beyond their narrow specializations and university-based scholarship to take a keen interest in public affairs and who use their expertise and exposure to shed light on a broad range of issues. They also include journalists, writers and other professionals who question society’s direction, and offer alternative ideas. The beauty of public intellectualism is that the intellectual at work is a disinterested party, he is interested in ideas not for his own benefit, but for the overall good of society, and he does not assume that his opinions are the best or that he alone understands the best way to run society and its organs. The product of this attitude is that discourse, a culture of debate, is encouraged and in the cross-pollination of ideas, a good current of thought is created; truth is spoken to power.

       We have had glimpses of this in Nigeria, and without trying to sketch a history of public intellectualism in our country or attempt a ranking of public intellectuals, let me just say that between the 60s and the 90s, there was so much fascination with ideas in this same country, it was as if the public mind was on fire. Academics from various disciplines took a keen interest in the prospects of the new Nigeria, and they went to the public arena to project ideas. Journalists became revered as sages, so much that certain newspaper columnists almost single-handedly sold newspapers. 

      Public lectures were organized which attracted persons who were just interested in ideas. Writers did a lot more than the professional task of producing novels, poems and plays and wrote public essays. The vendor’s stand every morning attracted not just buyers and free readers, but also young Nigerians who every morning debated major topics of concern. On television also, there were debates and those in the corridors of power also took ideas seriously.  So influential were intellectuals in the public space that they soon got invited to be part of government and although the military had always opposed intellectualism, at least one government, the Babangida government had the largest collection of intellectuals in office since independence. Many who lived during that era will remember the debates over the IMF/Structural adjustment Programme. 

       As the years went by however, public intellectualism began to decline. In 2006, Jimanze Ego-Alowes published a book titled How Intellectuals Underdeveloped Nigeria and Other Essays, an allusion to the complicity of intellectuals in the crisis that had by then engulfed the country.  Four years later, Rudolf Okonkwo in an article titled  “The Comedy of Our Public Intellectuals” observed as follows:  “the world of the Nigerian public intellectual is a zoo. It is a zoo full of nihilists. Some are sectarian in their outlook and others are humorless. Some are eccentric while others are comical. But one thing they all have in common is an over-inflated ego of their importance in the scheme of things.” 

       I don’t know about over-inflated ego, but I do know that the flame of public intellectualism in Nigeria is now almost a flicker. There are extremely few new significant voices, saying anything of consequence, the soldiers of old have become old, the fire in their belly, now subdued.  It is as if our academics have lost interest in public affairs, as only a few of them maintain a column or write an occasional piece or take on public issues in the manner of the likes of Wole Soyinka, Chinua Achebe, Segun Osoba, Claude Ake, Bade Onimode, Ola Oni, Mokwugo Okoye, Mahmud Tukur, Yusuf Bala Usman, Ayodele Awojobi, Biodun Jeyifo, Femi Osofisan, Stanley Macebuh, Odia Ofeimun, Niyi Osundare, Chinweizu, Kole Omotoso, Yemi Ogunbiyi, Bode Sowande, Patrick Wilmot…The opinion pages of the newspapers are no longer vibrant. There is so much “opinionitis”, but debate is rare and rejoinders are always self-serving.
       What has happened is that politically neutral intellectuals have now become scarce; the typical intellectual of today is not public in the sense in which that word is used; he is in reality affiliated to partisan and sectional interests.  The intellectual influence in Nigeria’s affairs is thus diminished because of obsession with individual interests: academics are now at best “acadapreneurs”: the intellectual as an entrepreneur. Business and partisan interests have compromised media houses; those once vibrant platforms are no longer offering vibrant ideas. Within the cultural sphere, there is a total dumbing down. Where are the creative writers?  They are still writing, but few want to get involved in the issues of the day and offer ideas.

      The effect is that we are in the age of clichés, of jargon writing, of mundane, unimaginative commentary. Whatever appears intellectual is written off as arrogant and there is no quality debate on anything because people have resorted to making fashionable statements that suit the moment and every one is locked in their own little corner, not willing to listen to the other side of the story.  The reading public, whatever is left of it, is also not interested in ideas or anything that requires rigorous thinking. We have thus lost a critical element of public intellectualism: an audience. The people are interested in easy stuff, in fashionable opinions that align with their own partisan interests. Nobody wants to read any long commentary; there is an obsession with short thinking, and whereas brevity may be a good technique, there are certain ideas that just cannot be reduced to a tweet.  It is really sad that today, intellectualism is seen as a threat.
  
        Even when corporations and politicians in power draw intellectuals close; they end up usurping the powers of the intellectual, compelling him to hold his intelligence within the scope of the definition of his assignment. Intellectuals can be inside or outside, and there are classical cases of intellectuals in power making a difference, but that age appears ended, the disdain of intellectualism has turned politicians and corporate gurus into wise men that they are not, and the intellectual into an organic element of power. The greatest power of the intellectual lies in his freedom; when he is denied that under any circumstance, society turns off its energy source and gradually, it is the self-imposed wisdom of clowns that prevails. 

      The gap that has been created seems to have been easily filled by internet gladiators who spend the day shuffling from Instagram to Facebook to Twitter and other social media threads. These new culture activists project a democratic impression of public intellectualism – and yes, there is a sense in which everyone is an intellectual, from the village priest to the village idiot-  but I don’t see the rigour, the breadth and depth and the aesthetic alienation that can elevate this genre and its promoters to the grade of public intellectualism. For the most part, social media in Nigeria is predominantly at the level of tabloid sensationalism, and it accommodates and offers the same degree of freedom to the ignorant and the mischievous, as well as the entrepreneur and the uncouth.  There is no doubt however that its content and the quality can be raised, but that will require innovation, the intervention of thinkers and the creation of new audiences that will be interested in something more than the quick and formulaic. 

         What we have lost is not the intellectual, as there are many educated Nigerians who are experts in their narrow fields, what we have lost is active intelligence as a tool for social progress. The rub is in the intelligence part of being intellectual. Being intellectual is about living a life of ideas and using those ideas to engage society intelligently in a committed manner. 
       In addition to other reasons, it may well be that our intellectuals are tired of engaging Nigeria.  Having tried over the years to engage the governance elite with ideas and to show that only good ideas should govern society and having been spurned by the politicians, Nigeria’s intellectual elite seems to have become so frustrated, it has retired largely into a state of indifference and inertia. What is the point knocking one’s head against a wall? But intellectuals in society cannot take such a stand. That will amount to an abdication of responsibility: when intellectuals do no more than make righteous noises, the harvest in the long run, is counter-productive. 

        Another factor is the emergence of a “climate of fear,” and a culture of silence/co-optation/acquiescence. Politicians distrust intellectuals; they can’t tolerate anyone around them speaking truth to power or raising disturbing questions.  The intellectual is expected to keep his ideas to himself and respect constituted authority. He is expected to enjoy his freedom in his head and dare not go public with it.  Ideas cannot thrive if the man of ideas is afraid to think, and whisper or speak. Rather than insist on the freedom to differ, many academics, journalists, writers and thinkers have since dropped the baton, and surrendered the public space. 

       But that is unhelpful cowardice.  Those who know better must continue to engage the public vigorously with ideas about governance and public policy, and encourage open debates, for the good of the entire society.  Those ideas must however, be relevant for them to be of any value; they must not be abstract theories that disconnect with the people’s realities, but ideas that offer intelligent solutions to practical problems. 
      Right now, there are critical areas where such intervention is needed: budgets, economic planning, handling a currency crisis that is fast turning into a nightmare (France has declared an economic emergency and yet was not in as bad a position as we are in…Argentina made changes to its export taxes to address its own dilemma…). We have had schizophrenic interventions by the Central Bank of Nigeria and yet where are the intellectuals to come up with analysis and desired alternative views, beyond bellyaching? Where are the inorganic public intellectuals to guide public thought?  Who are those thinking for government, the opposition and indeed the public space?

LOL: 10 Yoruba Demon Starter Packs

Ok, for those who don’t get the ‘Yoruba demon’ drift. It is a new slang used to describe Yoruba men especially the promiscuous ones. I don’t know where the slang originated from but trust me it has gonethr. So i stumbled on this article on nairalandnews and thought to share.



1. Agbada
A ‘Yoruba demon’ destiny is not complete without one of these, in fact, lots of these. All you need is a loyal dry cleaner to make sure a ‘turn up’ never catches you unaware.



2. The latest  100k phone

Forget Techno and the rest, a 100k phone is the right tool needed for the job, if you are going to break hearts, you’ll need to move quickly. Why else did you think slot made D’banj brand ambassador.


3. True Caller App

Except you are a spiritual demon, how do you plan to block or avoid the rain of curses from those lists of crying hearts that you have broken.


4. DSTV with full bouquet

She must DSTV and chill! With channels like E!, Zee world, Telemundo and co, you have to be able to keep her in and entertained as long as you want to. It adds to the enabling environment.

5. A Soji Gateman
A soji gateman

A soji gateman knows when to say
  • Oga is not at home.
  • Oga has travelled.
  • Take key and wait for oga
  • Oga has moved, one army officer just moved in.

6. Posh cars – G-Wagon, Range Rover etc

 A clean ride is a must, you might need to do late night pick ups and discharges.

7.  Posh hairstyle or Beard Gang
slack-imgs.commj
It’s all part of the script and it makes your job easier. Here is how;
So, Amaka takes a selfie with you and this posh look, with your iPhone 6 camera pixels doing some filtering and special effect, you come out looking like Drake. She shows you off to her friends and out of 8 friends, two of them steal her phone to get your number or add you on Facebook…. ‘Rinse and repeat”
8. That Red Cup
That red cup

The communal gathering cannot be complete without you and your red cup.


9. Weddings and Groomsmen 
These wedding events and turn ups are regular hunting grounds for single girls with hope and dreams, you need to be in the game and your game has to be on point.

10. Yoruba boy swag

To be a successful Yoruba demon, you have to be sleek and smooth. You have to drip swags, your smile has to be on point (even in your sleep). All these are drones that adds to your Arsenal. 


Culled from Nairalandnews.com

9ice's girlfriend makes customised pendants for his 4 children.

Singer, Abolore ‘9ice’ Akande’s new girlfriend , Sunkanmi Ajala has shared pictures of the customized pendants she made for the singer’s 4 children; Zion; his son with Toni Payne, May and Miya (the twin girls) and Mich.

‘All my babies names in one. Don’t we just love our gift…’ #Familyovereverything. She wrote on Instagram.

CAF Awards 2015: Aubameyang reveals he is hurt by Yaya Touré and Andre Ayew's comments

Dortmund player, Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang has hit back at criticisms from Ivory Coast’s Yaya Toure and Swansea midfielder Andre Ayew over his African Football’s player of the year award.
Recall that in a vote of coaches and technical directors of Caf nations, Aubameyang who has been the Bundesliga’s leading scorer so far this season with 18 goals, garnered 143 points, with Toure and Ayew getting136 and 112 points respectively.
Yet, Yaya Toure and Ghana’s Andre Ayew insisted that he doesn’t deserve the award. Toure even said the decision had brought “shame” on the continent.
Reacting to their comments, Aubameyang said “I was hurt by what was said. I spoke with Ayew, I did not understand [his attitude]. It doesn’t matter. The Golden Ball [of Africa] is played on all season. It’s a shame. The award is based on the whole year and not just the African Cup of Nations,” The Gabon international said.

Peter Okoye floats Football Management Agency

The half of Psquare duo, Peter Okoye has set up a football management agency called PClassic Football Management. Peter who also runs a dance competition called ‘Dance With Peter’ made the announcement on his Instagram page.

Watch the trailer of Kunle Afolayan's latest flick, 'The CEO'

 The trailer to distinguished filmmaker and actor, Kunle Afolayan’s highly anticipated flick , The CEO has been unveiled. The movie which was shot in Inagbe Resorts, as well as locations in South Africa, Kenya, Morocco, Paris, and other parts of Africa is the award-winning actor’s 5th movie project.

SYNOPSIS:

AFOLAYAN’S new movie tells the story of TransWire Communications, a global phone network with major operation in Nigeria. The CEO, an expatriate, has retired hence the Global Chairman has decided to send five nominees amongst his most senior level staff across Africa on a Leadership course in order to determine which one to appoint as the new CEO of Nigeria.

Kola Alabi: Nigerian, male, playboy, charming; along with Jomo Wangai: Kenyan, male, reserved; troubled; Eloise Toure: Ivorian, female, attractive, tenacious; Yasmin Raggi: Moroccan, female, beautiful, secretive; Riikard Van Outen: South African, white, male, unassuming, ambitious.

All five arrive from their respective destinations and check into the beach resort where the course is holding. Although they all appear cordial and chummy with each other, they all know what is at stake – they each desperately want the CEO’s chair. And to this purpose, they attempt to covertly outdo one another throughout the duration of the course.

Assisted by LISA, HR Coordinator for TransWire Global, the course Tutor, the mysterious Dr. Amet Zimmerman, starts off the course by making all five executives indulge in a round of the child’s game of musical chairs.  He uses this method to psychologically study each candidate’s modus operandi.

JOMO loses the first round. Zimmerman then sets about teaching the course. But soon intrigue, conspiracy and treachery take centre stage. Jomo’S dead body is washed ashore the next morning, apparently ruled ‘death by misadventure’. This shocks everyone… and soon they see an alarming pattern emerging – something bad happens to whoever loses the round of musical chairs they play each morning!

One by one, each candidate begins to be eliminated, until there are only two left. It then turns into a psychological game of sudden death! But who is really behind the mysterious and fatal occurrences? It is obvious that someone is trying to stab everyone else in the back so as to assert themselves for the prime position… a candidate who will go to the extent of murder in order to emerge as the new CEO.

Victor Valdes joins Belgian club.

One year after switching from Barcelona to Manchester United, Spanish goalkeeper, Victor Valdes has agreed a loan move to Standard Liege until the end of the season.

The 34-year-old had been at war with manager, Louis Van Gaal and had been negotiating an escape from Old Trafford for the past few months. 
He was reportedly forbidden from having a dressing room locker at the club.

Jose Mourinho denies claims he wrote to Manchester United over managerial role

Former Chelsea manager, Jose Mourinho has denied writing a lengthy letter to Manchester United stating his case to become a coach. Refuting the tales via his agent, Jorge Mendes, who described the rumours as ridiculous and absolutely nonsense.

“It doesn’t cross anyone’s mind that a manager such José Mourinho is writing letters to clubs, asking for a job. “It’s ridiculous and absolutely nonsense.” Mendes said in a statement.
The 52 year-old was dismissed by the club after a terrible run to the start of the season.

Chelsea sack steward for calling Fabregas a snake

Chelsea have fired a steward who labelled one of their midfielders, Cesc Fabregas “a snake”. Albeit the incident happened a while back, the footage was released on the Internet yesterday.

In the footage,  the ex Arsenal player appeared to have been very shocked when the steward told him: “You’re a snake, you’re Arsenal, what happened to you?”
A Chelsea spokesman however disclosed to MirrorSport that “The steward no longer works at Stamford Bridge.”
Open chat